http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp-2009-anomaly/ Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:35:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp-2009-anomaly/comment-page-1/#comment-127 drj Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:29:44 +0000 http://clearclimatecode.org/?p=112#comment-127 Turns out to be because I <a href="http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp-2009-anomaly-anomaly/" rel="nofollow">forgot to get fresh ocean data</a>. Oops. Now we're spot on. Turns out to be because I forgot to get fresh ocean data. Oops. Now we’re spot on.

]]> http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp-2009-anomaly/comment-page-1/#comment-123 drj Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:53:52 +0000 http://clearclimatecode.org/?p=112#comment-123 @Rattus: I see that too, thanks. I am slightly mystified by the 0.01 difference, but it's typical of the sort of differences we see due to rounding. @Rattus: I see that too, thanks. I am slightly mystified by the 0.01 difference, but it’s typical of the sort of differences we see due to rounding.

]]> http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp-2009-anomaly/comment-page-1/#comment-122 Rattus Norvegicus Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:19:47 +0000 http://clearclimatecode.org/?p=112#comment-122 With all the data in it came in at +.57. With all the data in it came in at +.57.

]]>