Comments on: GISTEMP http://clearclimatecode.org Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:35:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Artico verso l'abisso... eppure lo dicevamo che... - Pagina 132 http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp/comment-page-1/#comment-9644 Artico verso l'abisso... eppure lo dicevamo che... - Pagina 132 Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:58:04 +0000 http://clearclimatecode.org/?page_id=85#comment-9644 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> By: Open Questions about Open Source for Open Science | Serendipity http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp/comment-page-1/#comment-5046 Open Questions about Open Source for Open Science | Serendipity Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:15:41 +0000 http://clearclimatecode.org/?page_id=85#comment-5046 [...] does have a long list of existing initiatives, and a couple of major successes, most notably, a re-implementation of GISTEMP as open source Python, which helped to validate the original GISTEMP work, and provide an open [...] [...] does have a long list of existing initiatives, and a couple of major successes, most notably, a re-implementation of GISTEMP as open source Python, which helped to validate the original GISTEMP work, and provide an open [...]

]]> By: jkeyes http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp/comment-page-1/#comment-42 jkeyes Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:18:51 +0000 http://clearclimatecode.org/?page_id=85#comment-42 I updated the link on this page. I updated the link on this page.

]]> By: JS http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp/comment-page-1/#comment-39 JS Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:22:37 +0000 http://clearclimatecode.org/?page_id=85#comment-39 The link to the google code is invalid (but the source is there). [ed: it works for me - NB] The link to the google code is invalid (but the source is there).

[ed: it works for me - NB]

]]> By: steven mosher http://clearclimatecode.org/gistemp/comment-page-1/#comment-24 steven mosher Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:54:48 +0000 http://clearclimatecode.org/?page_id=85#comment-24 Cool your doing a re write in Python. A few of us who have worked with OPC ( other peoples code) have argued that a rewrite is the best way to understand what the code does. Looking forward to updates Cool your doing a re write in Python. A few of us who have worked with OPC ( other peoples code) have argued that a rewrite is the best way to understand what the code does. Looking forward to updates

]]>