Comments on: The 1990s station dropout does not have a warming effect

By: The Blackboard » Not So Spherical Cows: More Toy Problems.

The Blackboard » Not So Spherical Cows: More Toy Problems. — Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:18:17 +0000

[...] not– of if it did materialize, it appears small. The exact same analyses by Zeke, Tamino,, CCC, The Whiteboard etc. all suggest that any biases that might have been introduced by “the [...]

By: Unprecedented Warming ?? Maybe, Maybe Not

Unprecedented Warming ?? Maybe, Maybe Not — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:14:59 +0000

[...] [...]

By: drj

drj — Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:07:29 +0000

@cce: Yep. I’ve added a note to the issue so that we don’t forget to make it flexible enough to do other countries.

By: cce

cce — Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:06:27 +0000

Perhaps an email to Reto Ruedy to see if he could make the source code available.

Somewhat related, a cool feature for ccc-gistemp to have would be the ability to generate time series for individual countries. I wonder if you could pull country masks out of Google Earth or similar mapping software.

By: drj

drj — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:17:26 +0000

@cce: Hmm. What do you suggest we do? I suppose a ccc-gistemp version of Figure D is vaguely on the cards, and I've created Issue 101 so that we don't forget about it completely.

By: cce

cce — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 03:06:38 +0000

Sorry to comment to such an old post. Referencing my comments from last February and March, below is an example of how GISTEMP’s analysis of the US lower 48 states (Figure D) becomes fodder for “skeptics” and is thus relevent to the “debate.”

http://climateaudit.org/2010/12/26/nasa-giss-adjusting-the-adjustments/

By: Part 1/1000 of Debunking David Evans « clearscience

Part 1/1000 of Debunking David Evans « clearscience — Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:07:04 +0000

[...] has about the station drop out. First of all, lets remember that overall the station drop out had no effect on global temperatures: So having just debunked their entire argument, I could just leave it as it were and call it a [...]

By: Nick.Barnes

Nick.Barnes — Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:08:04 +0000

This post was referenced in an investment research paper called "Climate Change: Addressing the Major Skeptic Arguments", by Deutsche Bank Climate Change Advisors.

By: Prawdziwe „Climategate” | Prognozy numeryczne GFS/WRF

Prawdziwe „Climategate” | Prognozy numeryczne GFS/WRF — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:42:47 +0000

[...] kompletnie się mylili. Więcej na ten temat tutaj. Na stronie projektu ccc-gistemp także można znaleźć dowody, że skasowanie znacznej ilości stacji nie miało żadnego wpływu na obserwowane trendy. [...]

By: The Effect of Station “Dropout” on Gistemp | Peter O'Neill's Blog

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:01:36 +0000

[...] results have been published recently at Clear Climate Code and by Tamino at “Open Mind”. This post provides further detail of the effect at [...]