Comments on: The 1990s station dropout does not have a warming effect

By: Prawdziwe „Climategate” | Prognozy numeryczne GFS/WRF

Prawdziwe „Climategate” | Prognozy numeryczne GFS/WRF — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:42:47 +0000

[...] kompletnie się mylili. Więcej na ten temat tutaj. Na stronie projektu ccc-gistemp także można znaleźć dowody, że skasowanie znacznej ilości stacji nie miało żadnego wpływu na obserwowane trendy. [...]

By: The Effect of Station “Dropout” on Gistemp | Peter O'Neill's Blog

Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:01:36 +0000

[...] results have been published recently at Clear Climate Code and by Tamino at “Open Mind”. This post provides further detail of the effect at [...]

By: D’Aleo at Heartland: An Apple a Day « The Whiteboard

D’Aleo at Heartland: An Apple a Day « The Whiteboard — Tue, 25 May 2010 04:40:53 +0000

[...] Clear Climate Code, Feb. 26, 2010 compares GISTEMP type calculations of global surface temperature anomalies based on the “full” and “cut-off” thermometer set. They find no major differences between the two traces. [...]

By: » Af hverju eru færri veðurstöðvar og hver eru áhrif þess? Loftslag.is

» Af hverju eru færri veðurstöðvar og hver eru áhrif þess? Loftslag.is — Sun, 16 May 2010 17:20:06 +0000

[...] greining var einnig gerð af Clear Climate Code, sem bar einnig saman hitastigsgögn fyrir stöðvarnar sem duttu út og þær sem haldið var [...]

By: Scholars and Rogues » Climategate accusations shrivel under the glare of multiple investigations

Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:20:24 +0000

[...] that better statistical methods would have changed the results – NASA, NCDC, and now multiple different amateur reconstructions have all replicated the basic results of CRU using the same raw data CRU [...]

By: Dane CRU – średnie globalne anomalie temperatury | Prognozy numeryczne GFS/WRF

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:23:51 +0000

[...] przypomnieć, że chłopaki z ccc-gisstemp potwierdzają dokładnie to samo w stosunku do analizy GISS. Wygląda więc na to, że problem ów wylągł się jedynie w głowach [...]

By: drj

drj — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:45:15 +0000

@Steven: Trends calculated, updated chart in a newer blog post

By: drj

drj — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:08:03 +0000

Trend calculation was always on the todo list; now I've created Issue 49 so that we have a permanent reminder.

By: drj

drj — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:03:54 +0000

@Steven: secret fact about Google charts: the data is in the URL for the image. Right click on the graph and select “Copy Image Address” (or whatever is equivalent in your browser), then paste that into a document:

http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=lc&chds=-100,100&chtt=Global+Temperature+Anomaly|Land+Stations&chdl=post-cutoff|pre-cutoff&chdlp=t&chd=t:9,-7,27,9,15,1,5,-32,-13,22,-9,-29,-33,-28,-15,-16,-5,-1,-14,-21,1,1,-21,-29,-36,-25,-5,-32,-25,-26,-14,-19,-29,-23,1,3,-12,-37,-27,-8,-13,6,-10,-13,-11,-14,6,-9,-2,-23,-1,3,1,-11,2,-6,6,16,21,-1,9,7,9,5,12,-1,-2,10,-1,-9,-18,-3,2,11,-8,-8,-17,9,11,7,1,11,5,2,-24,-17,-9,-2,-13,0,4,-9,-4,19,-6,-1,-21,16,6,13,26,38,7,33,13,11,17,32,41,28,48,43,12,18,31,45,37,39,70,45,41,56,68,65,58,77,66,73,55,73,-999%7C-25,-9,-14,-17,-55,-26,-37,-64,-41,-6,-41,-72,-55,-60,-65,-54,-53,-22,-14,-32,-9,-9,-33,-42,-48,-35,-21,-49,-43,-41,-28,-35,-28,-28,0,11,-27,-65,-36,-9,-19,-12,-13,-16,-16,-19,3,-6,2,-23,-3,2,5,-14,5,-10,0,9,12,2,20,16,14,2,11,2,2,12,-4,-5,-9,-2,6,13,-7,-8,-27,4,13,6,1,8,5,6,-28,-12,-4,-3,-5,10,9,-21,-12,16,-14,0,-19,19,6,13,25,35,9,37,3,18,22,48,46,28,54,46,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999,-999&chxt=x,y,r&chxl=0:%7C1880%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1890%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1900%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1910%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1920%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1930%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1940%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1950%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1960%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1970%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1980%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C1990%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C2000%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C2010%7C1:%7C%7C-0.5%7C+0.0%7C+0.5%7C%7C2:%7C%7C-0.5%7C+0.0%7C+0.5%7C&chco=ff0000,0000ff&chs=440×330

See that list of mostly 2 digit numbers separated by commas? That’s the two data series (separated by %7C in the middle). The numbers are the actual anomalies in centikelvin (or 0.01 °C if you prefer). -999 is “no data”.

This is true for most (all?) of the charts I’ve prepared for this blog. They’re made with Clear Climate Code’s vischeck.py tool.

By: Steven mosher

Steven mosher — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:46:14 +0000

This is great.

Can you guys either post the data tables or calculate
trend lines for both cases.